Measure first, recommend second
AEO tooling is full of vague advice. We track exactly which prompts surface your brand and which sources drive each answer — then we recommend specific moves with specific evidence.
About
We build the scoreboard for the chat-window era.
Buyers ask AI before they ask Google. The first answer they read names three to five brands. We measure whether you’re named, where you lose, and the source-level moves that put you in the answer — across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity.
Why we built it
SEO ranks links. AEO wins answers. The metrics had to follow.
Every category-defining question now lands in a chat. The model writes a synthesized answer that names a handful of brands — and that’s the consideration set. Marketing teams can see this happening; what they couldn’t see, until now, was a measurement layer that put real numbers on it.
Existing tools don’t fit. SEO platforms measure rankings. Brand monitoring measures public mentions. Neither of them tells you what ChatGPT actually said when a buyer asked "best X for Y" yesterday afternoon.
Intendity is the missing layer. Same prompts your buyers ask, run daily across every major model. Mention rate, share of voice, citation coverage, sentiment — the scoreboard the rest of marketing already runs on, applied to the surface that’s increasingly defining the buyer journey.
Four principles behind every product decision.
Not values posters. Concrete commitments that show up in the data we collect, the recommendations we surface, and the integrations we ship.
Brand-strategy data deserves brand-strategy security
Your prompts and competitive set are sensitive. EU-hosted, encrypted, no model training on your data. Same posture on every plan, contractual depth on Enterprise.
API-first, not dashboard-only
AEO data has to live next to your other marketing metrics. REST API and MCP server are first-class — Intendity is a data source for your warehouse, not another disconnected tool.
Models change. Your scoreboard shouldn't.
New models ship constantly. We track every meaningful one as it gains adoption — without breaking the historical comparability of your visibility metrics.
What we believe about AEO.
Five claims that drive the product. They’re testable, they’re specific, and we change our minds on them as the data demands.
- 01
AI-mediated buyer journeys are permanent, not a phase. Even when the specific tools change, the discipline of measuring brand visibility inside generated answers won't.
- 02
Sources beat content. Earning a citation in the right Wikipedia article or trade-press piece beats publishing five blog posts the models will ignore.
- 03
Recommendations should be specific, not generic. "Improve your content" is useless. "Edit this Wikipedia article, win this listicle, ship this schema" is the work.
- 04
Marketing teams own AEO. The work overlaps SEO, PR and product marketing — but the strategic ownership belongs to whoever is accountable for category narrative.
- 05
AEO needs to be measurable like every other marketing channel. Mention rate, share of voice, citation coverage — the same kind of metric structure as every other surface.
Talk to us.
Founder-led support is non-negotiable while we’re still small. Every email reaches a human who can fix the issue, ship the feature, or send you the security questionnaire.
Run your first baseline.
Five minutes from sign-up to your first AI visibility report. Free plan, no credit card. Pro is €99 per brand per month.